🔗 Share this article

The governor of California, Gavin Newsom stated on Sunday that he is filing a lawsuit against President Trump regarding the alleged deployment of 300 California state guard troops to Oregon.

“Those forces are heading there as we speak,” Newsom remarked during a press announcement. “This administration is openly challenging the judicial framework itself and implementing their dangerous statements – defying court orders and viewing court officials, even presidential appointees, as adversaries.”

Legal Context and Federal Ruling

Newsom’s proposed lawsuit follows a federal judge’s ruling that prevented the federal government from deploying the Oregon national guard to Portland. US district judge Karin Immergut upheld claims that it would inflame rather than calm unrest in the city.

The judge said in her ruling, which delays dispatching the forces until at least October 18, that there was a insufficient proof that the recent protests in Portland warranted the action.

Local Officials React

Portland's legal representative, the deputy attorney, said that there had been peaceful conditions against federal agents for several months and that recent Ice protests were “sedate” in the days before the national leader described the city to be a war zone, at times including less than twelve protesters.

“This isn’t about public safety, the core issue is control,” Newsom said. “Legal action will be our response, but the citizens must not remain quiet in the face of such dangerous and autocratic behavior by the nation's leader.”

State Legal Chief Weighs In

Through an announcement on social media, the state's attorney general expressed that the state is evaluating choices and planning court proceedings.

“The President is evidently determined on deploying the military in domestic metropolitan areas, without facts or authority to do so,” he wrote. “Our responsibility and the judicial system to ensure accountability. We are committed to this course.”

National and State Reaction

State guard officials referred questions to the Department of Defense. A agency spokesman offered no response. There was no quick reply from the White House.

Broader Context

The news from Oregon came just a 24 hours after the President authorized the dispatch of military personnel to the city of Chicago, the most recent in a series of similar interventions across multiple US states.

Trump had initially revealed the initiative on 27 September, saying he was allowing complete use, should it be required” regardless of requests from Oregon officials and the elected officials, who reported there had been a one, peaceful protest outside an immigration office.

Historical Context

Historically, the President has promoted the storyline that the city is a battle-scarred urban center with activists involved in unrest and criminal acts.

Earlier in his administration in 2020, he sent federal forces to the city during the protests over the death by law enforcement of an individual in Minneapolis. The protests spread across the United States but were especially heightened in Portland. Despite rallies against federal authorities being modest in size in the region recently, Trump has pointed to them as grounds to deploy troops.

Commenting on X about the new decision from Trump, the governor said: “It’s appalling. It is contrary to our principles, and action is needed to halt it.”