🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 remains one of the most deadly – and consequential – days throughout thirty years of unrest in the region.

Within the community where it happened – the legacy of Bloody Sunday are displayed on the buildings and embedded in public consciousness.

A public gathering was conducted on a chilly yet clear afternoon in Derry.

The demonstration was opposing the system of detention without trial – detaining individuals without trial – which had been put in place after three years of unrest.

Troops from the specialized division shot dead 13 people in the Bogside area – which was, and still is, a predominantly Irish nationalist population.

One image became notably memorable.

Photographs showed a religious figure, Fr Edward Daly, using a blood-stained cloth in his effort to shield a crowd moving a youth, the fatally wounded individual, who had been fatally wounded.

News camera operators documented extensive video on the day.

The archive includes the priest telling a journalist that troops "appeared to discharge weapons randomly" and he was "totally convinced" that there was no justification for the discharge of weapons.

That version of events was rejected by the initial investigation.

The first investigation concluded the military had been fired upon initially.

Throughout the resolution efforts, Tony Blair's government commissioned a new investigation, after campaigning by family members, who said Widgery had been a cover-up.

During 2010, the findings by the investigation said that generally, the paratroopers had discharged weapons initially and that none of the casualties had presented danger.

The then Prime Minister, the Prime Minister, expressed regret in the government chamber – declaring killings were "unjustified and unjustifiable."

Law enforcement started to investigate the matter.

One former paratrooper, known as the defendant, was prosecuted for murder.

Indictments were filed regarding the killings of the first individual, twenty-two, and in his mid-twenties another victim.

Soldier F was additionally charged of seeking to harm several people, other civilians, further individuals, an additional individual, and an unidentified individual.

Exists a judicial decision maintaining the soldier's identity protection, which his lawyers have argued is required because he is at risk of attack.

He told the Saville Inquiry that he had exclusively discharged his weapon at persons who were carrying weapons.

This assertion was rejected in the concluding document.

Material from the inquiry was unable to be used directly as proof in the legal proceedings.

In court, the defendant was screened from view behind a privacy screen.

He addressed the court for the initial occasion in court at a hearing in that month, to reply "not guilty" when the charges were read.

Kin of the victims on Bloody Sunday travelled from the city to the judicial building each day of the proceedings.

A family member, whose sibling was killed, said they were aware that listening to the case would be painful.

"I visualize everything in my recollection," John said, as we examined the main locations discussed in the trial – from the location, where his brother was shot dead, to the adjacent the courtyard, where James Wray and William McKinney were killed.

"It reminds me to where I was that day.

"I participated in moving Michael and lay him in the medical transport.

"I experienced again the entire event during the proceedings.

"Notwithstanding enduring the process – it's still meaningful for me."